What makes this British gangster Such-a compelling character despite being arguably one of the least heroic protagonists out there, bordering on being worse than the villains in most shows is his calm and calculated approach in running his empire, one that coincides with the teachings of Niccolò Machiavelli on how a good ruler must rule. Best defined in his literary work the ‘prince?’
We often define people who display such characteristics as Machiavellian in nature. Other notable Machiavellian figures in fiction include Tywin Lannister from game of thrones, and Frank underwood from House of Cards. But while these two characters are often seen as villain Thomas Shelby somehow manages to strike the right chord at which we still root for him.
The Morality of the Prince
Depending on one S own personal views the term, Machiavellian can come across as either an insult or a compliment but the teachings can be basically bought down to:
A Clear focus on one’s own ambition, and the ability to always see the bigger picture.
An understanding that it is better to be feared and respected rather than be loved.
The Ends justify the means. And no action is off limits to achieve ones goals.
Are they near to or psychopaths in real life?
Can you also analyse Walter white, Sheldon Cooper, etc like this?